Touchstone anthology of contemporary creative nonfiction Essay

Comparative essay assignment creative activity In the Trenches create verb completely toldy by Charles Yale Harrison and This Is non Who We Are written by Naomi Shihab ar devil various pieces of work which schema almost the uniform in contenddness. The analysis of these cardinal stories differs in various carriages such(prenominal) as application of styles, minds and imagery as articulated in for each one and only(a) of the committal to writings. two contexts give a description nigh the occurrence of strugglef ars in the twentieth deoxycytidine monophosphate in the States still in different parts. In the take advantagees which are written by Canadian generator Charles Yale Harrison is a layer about the Canadian fight which starts in Monreal, a ready where an unsung s sometime(a)ier who is twenty years old is together with Canadian spends formulating to set up the Germans in Belgium and France. In this writing, a flagitious and realistic portrayal is descr ibed in an anti contend statement. This written report is expressed from the offset mortal point of opinion of a spend who is in a oceanic abyss. The source begins the story by describing his close relationship with his fellow traveller soldiers Anderson, Brown, Broadbent and Cleary and then shifts to the scenes of the infamous World war 1 infringees whereby the narrow downs are filthy and the soldiers are continually exposed to the flesh-looting rainfalls, lice and ample rats (Harrison, 2002). However, Naomi Shihab, Arab-Ameri kitty poet is the writer of This is non who we are which is almost equivalent to the in the trenches although the writer of this story designate it in form of a poem. This story begins with the writers personal deportment who seek relative safety in the American southwest which is a place mangled by war. She describes her marital and delirious connection to Palestine since this is her ancestral home come. The writer offers evidence of life in safer milieu which she feels the disgrace of being an Arab in America at a time when every(prenominal) Arab is considered suspect, including her (Nye, 1997). Nevertheless, the introduction of these two stories brings a thought on what the entire story is all about. The ideas between the two stories are presented in a different way depending on the kind of structure and form of each author. Therefore both(prenominal) contain different or similar estimates, styles and literary devices in delivering the kernel which the author wants to communicate.Styles Both stories make up employed styles in communicating the message to the targeted audience in form of simile, metaphor, prosopopoeia and imagery. Similes is the main style applied in both contexts, Naomi Shihab, the writer of This is not who we are begins by describing Arab-American skillful violinist as a stylish man who dresses neat black suits and white shirts and plays comparable an angel. The writer adds that she wish f or world symbols kind of than the valuable American vehicles which wear American flags interchangeable hula skirts. This bases how she wished that the war could end rather than being prosperous and rich in a violent land. Moreover, the writer regaining to describe the world that she wished to be and thither is application of another simile when she states that she can treasure the welcoming world of women, smiling, nurturing, fixing, up lay aside and wrapping language around one another like a unassailable cloak. Similarly, Charles Yale Harrison has also applied similes in his writing when he was in the trench and states that he seen the whole army of fit posts beginning to move like a silent host towards him (Harrison, 2002). As the condition of war worsens, the writer depicts the boys who were in firing-step aphorism that they were like dead men. In addition, as the soldiers struggles in the dirt trench to lay aside their lives, the writer applies simile by stating that they shew to hideaway into the ground like frightened rats. However, Charles Yale Harrison describes the red-tailed comets which were sent by the Germans as look pretty like the fireworks they have left-hand(a) in Monreal adding that the sky is lit by hundreds of extravagant fireworks like a wickedness carnival which sounds very ironical. During the process of nurse themselves from the explosives, the writer illustrate using a simile stating that the soldiers thrown their faces downward on the bottom of the grovel and trench like savages before that demoniac havoc. The application of similes in these two stories helps the audience to generate a kind of comparison which improves the understanding of what is red ink on. Moreover, metaphors and imagery has been applied in these two stories. Naomi Shihab (1997) describes the terrorist as men with ruffianly faces who do vicious things. Although the terrorists are Arabs, the writer does not refer them as Arabs since she is one of them and wants to show that all Arabs are not terrorists. The appearance of men with the toilsome faces causes the writer to defend herself and her mountain against the idea that she is one of those with hard faces who choose fierceness over words. This certainty serves a major drive of explaining that blaming all Arabs because of behavior of the some terrorists is unfair. The writer states a story about a world who approaches her this makes her afraid because she a half Arab so this makes her to be momentarily tongue-tied but later finds her voice. Correspondingly, Harrison applies much of imagery and metaphors opus describing the nature of the trench during war. He states that the trench is unsanitary due to the presence of mud, huge rats, flesh-rotting rainfalls and lice (Reid, 2004). The condition of the trench does not keep soldiers comfortable since they struggle to protect themselves from explosives of their enemies even so the place they are hiding is not safe. This story is distressing and upsetting illumine the certainties of war through the eyes of a young soldier and the impressions they fragment.Themes Theme of war is popular from both stories since the principal message is about the occurrence of war. This constitution develops powerfully in In the Trenches written by Charles Yale Harrison, war between his fellow soldiers and the Europeans begins from the first line up to the last line. jibe to the writer, the war is horrifying and we find a sense of shock at the rigor of war which alters depression to the soldiers. Charles Yale Harrisons story leads us to wonder about wherefore humans continue to retort to war in response to worldwide clashes darn being fully conscious of its emphasis (Williford and Martone, 2007). The writer states how one of his fellow soldier said loudly as they palisade that no wonder they are losing the blooming(a) war. Moreover, the writer keeps stating that so this is war in many a(prenominal) parts of the story thence depicting that the war is occurring. Conversely, Naomi Shihab describes the theme of war in form of terrorism which is caused by the men with hard faces. She describes his ancestral land as a place torn by war, (Williford &Martone, 51). This can seemingly show the presence of war when she was writing this story. However, theme of low-down is another theme which has been described in both pieces of writing. Harrison begins describing the theme of suffering by describing how his friend by the name Fry suffers with his feet, as he keeps sliding into holes and creeping out, all the way up. The writer adds that he can study his friend coughing and panting substructure him. In addition the writer states that his snout is bleeding from the force of the detonations (Reid, 2004). Generally, Harrison gives description on how they are impact by the conditions of the trench as they try to protect themselves from the explosives this brings the theme of suffering plainly. Similarly, Naomi Shihab states that she cannot forget the fate of the people who suffer the daily indignities of surviving in a world at war, of contumacious pain caused by the men with hard faces. In addition the writer says that she comprise in heart so many distressed individuals because all friends and families of innocent victims affected by war are everywhere. This government agency that there were many people suffering due to the violence which was happening (Nye, 1997). end Generally, by comparing the two pieces of writing, I can conclude that they portray the same message but in a different manner and style because both stories focuses heavily on the conceit of war and violence in relation to the society. Harrison brings a clear perspective of the soldiers who were simply unexperienced youths, scrap ineffectively for meaningless ideals. Naomi Shihab brings a general explanation that blaming all Arabs for behavior of the few terrorists is absolute unfair. Both stories s hape the rising altitudes to war and develop a wholesome enthusiasm to the audience.ReferencesHarrison, C. (2002). Generals die in bed. Toronto Annick Press.Nye, N. (1997). Habibi. in the altogether York Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers.Reid, J. H. (2004). Award-winning films of the 1930s From move to Gone with the wind the definitive guide. Morrisville, NC spectator Press.The Canadian republic magazine. (1929). Montreal s.n.Williford, L., & Martone, M. (2007). Touchstone anthology of contemporaneous creative nonfiction. New York Simon & Schuster.Source memorial